“Tughlaq”
- Girish Karnad
“Tughlaq” is written by Girish Karnad.
“Tughlaq” play based on the life of true historical character Mohammad Bin Tughlaq.
Tughlaq - te play divided into thirteen scenes. It is about the turbulent rule of
Mohammad Bin Tughlaq.
The reign of Mohammad Bin Tughlaq
stated in Delhi. At the very beginning Tughlaq wants to be king of Delhi but he
cannot so he killed his brother and got the reign. The reign cannot rule
without conspiracy and the reign of Tughlaq is best example of that. The
intention of Tughlaq behind ruling the kingdom was good. The protagonist,
Mohammad Bin Tughlaq, known for his reformist, ‘ahead of his times’ ideas had a
grand vision, but his reign was an abject failure. He started his rule with
great ideals of a unified India. Yet in 20 years his reign had degenerated into
anarchy and his kingdom had become a “kitchen of
death”. He wants to make city good at every
level. He wants to make city growing and also wants to make his city people’s
life better from the present situation. In that era he wants to make city
global and fertile but the downfall of his ideal city. The situation totally
opposite from what he thinks of the Delhi. In a way city is not growing but
it’s become a “Kitchen of Death”.
The play Tughlaq explores the series
of events that led to the downfall of one of the most fascinating kings to
occupy the throne in Delhi. The vision of Tughlaq to unify India and keep
religion out of politics cost him dearly. Tughlaq wants to keep religion far beyond
to political matters. But the play highlights how religion can be misused to
bring in the common man into a foul play because many murders done by Tughlaq
in between the time of prayer. It is holy place but when the time came he used
it for his own purpose to keep kingdom in his own hand.
Likewise, he was familiar to Hindu
citizen and also wants to keep close relationship with Hindu. Due to this he
put forth reformist ideas to bring about trust in his Hindu citizens like
scrapping the “jijia” tax on
Hindus. One of his ideas was shifting the capital from Delhi to Daulatabad in
order to have the capital that is not only the centre of his province but also
a Hindu dominated area. The reason behind this is that the Hindu community
known as business class and he wants to make his city global but on the other
side it’s make negative effect on his own people. His own people’s life
disturbed because of his nonsensical idea to shift Delhi to Daulatabad because
shifting city is not the normal work. In which they provide all facilities to
his people. In this matter he become weak that he was not able to provide
facilities because his most of the people are died for starvation, lack of
medicine and what not. So the idea totally goes in vain. Moreover the play
dramatically highlights that how the business class of the country always tried
to influence the decisions of the Ruler.
The play covers the consequences that
followed this decision. The protagonist, Tughlaq described as a strict yet
respected ruler. The two characters Aziz and Azam, represented a section of
people who are clever enough to identify and misuse the loop holes and in every
law to enrich them.
The intelligence of both characters
that reader can saw that time while Tughlaq pass decision that all the money or
golden coins translated into silver coins. They both are understood that it is
foolish decision that his king passed. So they both are made silver coins and collected
golden coins from people with the intension that one day good king came that
time that collected golden coins are made them rich. Through this reader can
understand that instead of king, his people of kingdom are very cleaver and
intelligent also. In short all the decision which is taken from king Tughlaq is
in vain. It is not making his city how he dreams.
The play outlines his clever plots to
eliminate his opponents and ends with scenes of utter chaos and misery in the kingdom,
and Tughlaq being left alone, having been abandoned by those who survived him.
The play intends at capturing the helplessness of a great ruler, his downfall
no matter how big the plays and the vision in the hands of the religion and
business class. Ultimately he left by his best friend and he also lost his
family. He got nothing and also not able to giving something to his people
instead of pain. This play seems on the outlook as a historical play, but is
appropriate to the contemporary politics of any era, especially in the current
global scenario. In history he was capture with the nick name “Mohammad as a Mad”.
Instead of that there are some good
decisions that Tughlaq taken like he wants to capture two different religion
people like Hindu and Muslim and he also wants that they mush up with each
other. Another thing is that Karnad wrote this play in 1964 was the time of
Indian independence. The thought of Gandhian flow everywhere but the Gandhian
principles was still hopelessly locked in sectarian violence and communal
hatred, the very elements that Karnad’s Tughlaq desire to overcome in the play.
Thank you...it is very helpful for me in my mid- term examination.
ReplyDeleteNice post.
ReplyDelete